---
name: brand-architecture
description: "Designs brand architecture frameworks (house of brands, branded house, endorsed) with naming conventions, visual relationships, and portfolio management. Use when managing multiple brands."
allowed-tools: Read Write Glob
metadata:
  author: matthewhitcham
  version: "1.0"
---

# Brand Architecture

## When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when you need to:
- Organize multiple products or services under a coherent brand structure
- Choose between branded house, house of brands, or endorsed brand models
- Define the naming and visual relationship between a parent brand and sub-brands
- Plan brand architecture for a growing product portfolio

**DO NOT** use this skill for single-product branding, logo design, or marketing strategy. This is for structuring the relationships between multiple brands or product lines.

---

## Core Principle

BRAND ARCHITECTURE SHOULD MAKE IT EASY FOR CUSTOMERS TO UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU OFFER AND HOW YOUR PRODUCTS RELATE TO EACH OTHER — CONFUSION IS THE ENEMY.

---

## Phase 1: Brief

### Required Inputs

| Input | What to Ask | Default |
|-------|------------|---------|
| **Parent brand** | "What is your main company or brand name?" | Must be provided |
| **Products/services** | "List all products, services, or brands in your portfolio." | Must be provided |
| **Target audiences** | "Do different products serve different audiences?" | Same or overlapping |
| **Growth plans** | "Are you planning to add new products or enter new markets?" | Yes — expanding |
| **Current structure** | "How are products currently named and branded?" | Ad hoc, inconsistent |
| **Brand equity** | "Which brand name has the most recognition?" | Parent brand |

**GATE: Confirm brief before recommending an architecture model.**

---

## Phase 2: Recommend

### Architecture Models

**1. Branded House (Google model)**
- One master brand, products are descriptive sub-brands
- Example: Google Maps, Google Drive, Google Photos
- Best when: parent brand has strong equity, products share an audience
- Risk: one product failure affects the whole family

**2. House of Brands (P&G model)**
- Independent brands with no visible parent connection
- Example: Tide, Pampers, Gillette (all P&G)
- Best when: products serve very different audiences
- Risk: no equity transfer between brands, expensive to build each one

**3. Endorsed Brands (Marriott model)**
- Sub-brands with visible parent brand endorsement
- Example: Courtyard by Marriott, Residence Inn by Marriott
- Best when: sub-brands need independence but benefit from parent credibility
- Risk: dilution if too many endorsed brands

**4. Hybrid**
- Mix of models for different parts of the portfolio
- Example: Apple (branded house for most products) + Beats (endorsed brand)
- Best when: portfolio is diverse with some shared and some distinct audiences

### Recommendation Framework

Score each model on:
- Brand equity leverage (can you use the parent name?)
- Audience overlap (same people or different?)
- Risk tolerance (can one product's failure hurt others?)
- Budget (single brand is cheaper to maintain)

**GATE: Present the recommended model with rationale and wait for approval.**

---

## Phase 3: Build

### Deliverables

**1. Brand Architecture Map**
- Visual hierarchy showing parent and sub-brand relationships
- Naming convention for each level
- Visual identity relationship (shared colors? shared logo mark? independent?)

**2. Naming Framework**
- Naming pattern for current and future products
- Examples showing how new products would be named
- Rules for when to create a new brand vs. extend the existing one

**3. Visual Relationship Guide**
- How sub-brands visually connect to the parent (logo lockup, color family, typography)
- Logo co-branding rules (size ratio, placement, clear space)
- When to show the parent brand and when to hide it

**4. Decision Framework for New Products**
- Flowchart: when to add a sub-brand vs. a product feature vs. a new independent brand
- Criteria: audience match, brand fit, strategic importance, risk

---

## Phase 4: Polish

### Portfolio Management Rules

- Maximum sub-brands before customer confusion (typically 5-7)
- Retirement criteria for underperforming brands
- Annual portfolio review process

### Communication Guide

How to explain the brand relationships to customers, partners, and team members clearly.

---

## Example 1: SaaS Company with 3 Products

**Model:** Branded house. All products under the parent name: "Acme CRM," "Acme Analytics," "Acme Chat." Shared visual identity with color variations per product.

## Example 2: Creator with Multiple Ventures

**Model:** Endorsed brands. Personal brand as endorser: "Founder's Newsletter" by [Name], "[Product Name]" by [Name]. Each venture has its own identity with the creator's name as trust signal.

---

## Anti-Patterns

- **No architecture at all** — random product names with no visible connection waste the equity you have built. Structure creates clarity.
- **Copying big company models** — P&G's house of brands works because of billions in marketing budget. A solopreneur should almost always use a branded house.
- **Too many sub-brands** — 12 sub-brands dilute attention and confuse customers. Consolidate where possible.
- **Changing architecture frequently** — customers need time to learn your structure. Pick a model and commit for at least 2-3 years.
- **Architecture that serves the org chart** — brand structure should reflect how customers think, not how your company is organized internally.

---

## Recovery

- **Portfolio is already a mess:** Audit all brands, identify the strongest, and create a migration plan to consolidate under a clear architecture.
- **Two products with overlapping audiences:** Consider merging into one product with feature tiers rather than maintaining two separate brands.
- **User wants every product to feel independent:** Show the cost — separate websites, separate social accounts, separate marketing budgets. Let the math inform the decision.
- **Growing too fast to plan:** Set the architecture model now with a naming framework. New products slot into the framework without requiring a new strategy each time.
